Tuesday, October 14, 2014

ANGINA PECTORIS



SALIENT FEATURES

History

· Have you ever had any pain or discomfort in the chest'?
· How would you describe the chest discomfort (heavy, burning, tightness, stabbing, pressure)'?
· Do you get this on walking at ordinary pace on the level or does it come on when you walk uphill or
hurry'?
· When you get the pain/discomfort, do you stop, slow down or continue at the same pace?
· Does the pain/discomfort go away when you stand still'? (It is typically relieved by rest or nitroglycerine
within 10 minutes.)
· Where do you get this pain? (Angina is a visceral sensation and is poorly localized, therefore patients
rarely point to the location of their discomfort with one finger.)
· Does it radiate elsewhere (e.g. arms, jaw, epigastrium)?
· Does food or cold weather bring on the pain'?
· Ask about risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, hypertension, family history of ischaemic heart
disease.

Examination

Typically no signs are manifest, but patients should be examined for evidence of the following:
· Hypertension (see pp 27-30).
· Hyperlipidaemia (see pp 440-1).
· Diabetes (see pp 518-23).
· Left ventricular outflow obstruction (aortic stenosis, hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy).
· Previous myocardial infarction

DIAGNOSIS

This patient has angina pectoris (lesion) which is due to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease
(aetiology). She is in Canadian Cardiovascular Society functional class II (functional status).

QUESTIONS

How is angina graded by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society?
There are four functional classes:
· Class I: Angina occurs only with strenuous or rapid or prolonged exertion.
· Class II: There is slight limitation of ordinary activity (e.g. climbing more than one flight of ordinary
stairs at a normal pace and in normal conditions).
· Class III: There is marked limitation of ordinary activity (e.g. climbing more than one flight in normal
conditions).
· Class IV: Inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort - anginal syndrome may be
present at rest.
What is the mechanism of angina pectoris?
It commonly results from increased myocardial oxygen demand triggered by physical activity, but it can
also be caused by transient decreases in oxygen delivery due to coronary vasospasm. Unstable angina is
caused by non-occlusive intra-coronary thrombi.
How would you investigate a patient with angina pectoris?
· Haemoglobin: anaemia aggravates angina.
· Rest ECG: to detect left ventricular hypertrophy, prior Q-wave MI or ST-T changes.
· Rest echocardiogram: done only when there is clinical suspicion of aortic stenosis or hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy.
· Exercise ECG: to precipitate symptoms, to document workload at onset and to record any
associated ECG abnormality (?> I mm of horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression or
elevation for ?> 60 to 80 ms after the end of the QRS complex) or arrhythmia.
· Exercise myocardial perfusion imaging or exercise echocardiography in patients who have one of
the following baseline ECG abnormalities: (a) LBBB, (b) more than 1 mm of rest ST depression, (c)
electronically paced ventricular rhythm, and in patients with prior revascularization (PTCA or CABG)
or in whom consider-ations of functional significance of lesions or myocardial viability are important.
· Coronary angiography: provides detailed anatomical in/ormation about site and severity of luminal
narrowing due to coronary atherosclerosis and less common non-atherosclerotic causes such as
coronary artery spasm, coronary anomaly, primary coronary artery dissection and radiation-induced
coronary vasculopathy.
How would you treat a patient with chronic stable angina pectoris?
Mnemonic ABCDE (Circulation 1999; 99: 2829-48):
· Aspirin, Anti-anginal therapy and ACE-inhibitor therapy. Aspirin has been shown to reduce the
incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction and the overall incidence of cardiac events, although
overall death rate and the incidence of fatal myocardial infarction were similar to those obtained with
placebo in the Swedish Angina Pectoris Aspirin Trial (SAPAT) study. Ramipril up to 10 mg once a day
should be offered to all patients in view of the new HOPE trial.
· Beta-blocker and Blood pressure.
· Cigarette smoking and Cholesterol.
· Diet and Diabetes.
· Education and Exercise.
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (with or without coronary stent)
· Complementary to drug treatment and surgery: no improvement in survival.
· Best results are achieved in discrete single-vessel coronary artery disease.
· The restenosis rate is -30% at 6 months; for balloon angioplasty with stenting. restenosis is lower, -20%.
· The ACME (Angioplasty Compared to Medicine) study showed that PTCA can offer better symptomatic
relief than medical therapy in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease, but is a much more
expensive procedure and is associated with complications (including emergency and elective coronary
by-pass and second PTCA).
· The RITA (Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina) study compared PTCA with coronary artery
bypass graft (CABG) and found that both procedures have similar prognostic implications with risk of
death or myocardial infarction similar in the two groups, but more patients in the PTCA group required a
second revascularization procedure and more antianginal therapy.
Coronary artery bypass grafting
· This has prognostic value in patients with left main-stem coronary stenosis or three-vessel coronary
artery disease and impaired left ventricular function.
· The risk of surgery is related to the degree of impairment of left ventricular function.
Neurostimulation
This is useful in refractory cases and involves the use of percutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS)
or spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
Transmyocardial revascularization
A laser is used to drill tiny holes into the heart, providing symptomatic relief h-om refractory angina, but
does not improve cardiovascular function or reduce adverse ischaemic events.

ADVANCED-LEVEL QUESTIONS

What is the prognosis of patients with angina?
· Fourteen per cent of patients with newly diagnosed angina pectoris progress to unstable angina,
myocardial infarction, or death within I year.
· Mortality at coronary artery bypass grafting with normal ventricular function is 1 %.
What is the significance and the mechanism of postprandial angina?
The presence of postprandial angina indicates severe coronary artery disease; one mechanism is
'intramyocardial steal' with blood being distributed from the stenotic territories to the normal territories
(Circulation 1998; 97: 1144-9). It results from the carbohydrate content of the meal (Am J Cardio/ 1997;
79: 1397-1400) and can be ameliorated by prior treatment with octreotide (Circulation 1996; 94: 1-730),
which prevents postprandial vasodilatation of the superior mesenteric artery.
How would you follow a patient with stable angina in your clinic?
· Patients with successfully treated chronic stable angina pectoris should have a follow-up evaluation every
4-12 months. During the first year of therapy evalu-ations every 4-6 months are recommended. After the
first year of therapy, annual evaluations are recommended provided the patient is stable and reliable
enough to call or make an appointment when anginal symptoms become worse or other symptoms occur.
Patients who are co-managed by their general practitioner and cardiologist may alternate these visits
(Circulation 1999; 99: 282948).
· The ACC/AHA 'five questions' that must be answered regularly during the follow-up of the patient
who is receiving treatment for chronic stable angina (Circulation 1999; 99: 282948):
1. Has the patient decreased the level of physical activity since the last visit?
2. Have the patient's anginal symptoms increased in frequency and become more severe since the last
visit'? If the symptoms have worsened or the patient has decreased physical activity to avoid
precipitating angina, then he or she should be evaluated and treated according to either the unstable
angina or chronic stable angina guidelines, as appropriate.
3. How well is the patient tolerating therapy'?
4. How successful has the patient been in reducing modifiable risk factors and improving knowledge
about ischaemic heart disease'?
5. Has the patient developed any new comorbid illnesses or has the severity or treatment of known
comorbid illnesses worsened the patient's angina'?
What do you understand by the term unstable angina?
This includes patients with more severe or frequent angina superimposed on chronic stable angina,
angina at rest or minimal exertion, or angina of new onset (within I month) which is brought about by
minimal exertion.
It is a potentially dangerous condition and patients should be admitted to a coronary care unit and
begun on antianginal therapy including beta-blockers, aspirin and intravenous nitrates. Intravenous
heparin should be started in patients with rest angina of 48 hours duration and in those with chest pain
and ischaemic ECG changes on admission. Most patients stabilize with this treatment, although some
may require intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation before cardiac catheterization. A monoclonal antibody
7E3 against platelet glycoprotein llb/IIIa, which prevents platelet adhesion and degranulation, is
undergoing evaluation in the treatment of unstable angina.
What is Prinzmetal's angina?
It is angina occurring at rest, unpredictably, and associated with transient ST seg-ment elevation on the
ECG. Coronary vasospasm is the cause, often in the presence of atherosclerosis.
How is exercise testing useful in determining the prognosis of chest pain ?
A study at Duke University used exercise testing to determine high- and Iow-risk subsets in patients with
chest pain suggestive of ischaemic heart disease:
· Low-risk subset: subjects who could complete 9 minutes of exercise using the Bruce protocol without
evidence of ischaemic ST segment changes and achieve a maximal sinus heart rate in excess of 160
beats per minute. These were found to have a l-year survival rate of 99% and a 4-year survival rate of
93%. This .means that cardgac ,.:atheterixation and CABG ,:an be deferre,J.
· High-risk subset: those who were forced to stop exercising in stages I or Il (under 6 minutes);
survival rate was 85% at I year and 63% at 4 years.
What do you understand by the term 'syndrome X'?
· Syndrome X, or microvascular angina, is the presence of classic angina and ST depression on
exercise stress testing and a normal coronary angiogram in the absence of any other demonstrable
cardiac abnormalities.
· Reaven's syndrome or 'endocrine' syndrome X is the association of insulin resistance, hypertension,
and increased very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and decreased high density lipoprotein (HDL)
cholesterol concentrations in the plasma.
Coronary artery bypass grafting wasintroduced by R.G. Favalaro in 1969 while he was at the Cleveland
Clinic, USA (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969; 58: 178-85).
Balloon angioplasty was introduced by Arthur Gruntzig, a Swiss cardiologist, in 1977 (Lancet 1978; i:
263).

GALLOP RHYTHM



SALIENT FEATURES

History

· Dyspnoea and determine NYHA class.
· Paroxysmal nocturnal dysnoea.
· Swelling of the feet.

Examination

· Presence of an abnormal third or fourth heart sound with tachycardia (the presence of a normal third
or fourth heart sound does not connote a gallop rhythm unless there is associated tachycardia).
· Auscultate with the bell as third and fourth heart sounds are low pitched.
· Gallop rhythm due to third heart sound seems to sound like 'Kentucky', whereas that due to the
fourth heart sound sounds like 'Tennessee'.
Note
· A left ventricular--third heart sound is best heard at the apex, whereas the right ventricular third heart
sound is best heard along the left sternal border.
· In emphysematous patients the gallop is better heard when listening over the xiphoid or epigastric
area.

DIAGNOSIS

This patient has gallop rhythm (lesion) which indicates that he is in cardiac failure (functional status).

QUESTIONS

What is the expression used when both the third and fourth heart sounds are heard with
tachycardia ?
This is known as the summation gallop. It can sometimes be mistaken for a diastolic rumbling murmur.

ADVANCED-LEVEL QUESTIONS

What is the mechanism of production of the third heart sound?
It is caused by rapid ventricular filling in early diastole.
What is the mechanism of production of the fourth heart sound?
it is caused by vigorous contraction of the atria (atrial systole) and hence is heard towards the end of
diastole.
How do you differentiate between the fourth heart sound, a split first heart sound and an ejection
click?
The fourth heart sound is not heard when pressure is applied on the chest piece of the stethoscope, but
pressure does not eliminate the ejection sound or the splitting of the first heart sound.
What are the causes of a third heart sound?
Physiological: in normal children and young adults.
Pathological:
· Heart failure.
· kelt ventricular dilatation without failure: mitral regurgitation, ventricular septal
defect, patent ductus arteriosus.
· Right ventricular S3 in right ventricular failure, tricuspid regurgitation.
What are the implications of a third heart sound in patients with valvular heart disease?
· in patients with mitral regurgitation, they are common but do not necessarily reflect ventricular systolic
dysfunction or increased filling pressure (N Engl J Med 1992: 327: 458-62).
· In patients with aortic stenosis, third heart sounds are uncommon but usually indicate the presence
of systolic dysfunction and raised filling pressure.
What are the causes of a fourth heart sound?
Normal: in the elderly.
Pathological:
· Acute myocardial infarction.
· Aortic stenosis (the presence of S4 in individuals below the age of 40 indicates significant
obstruction).
· Hypertension. (It is a constant finding in hypertension.)
· Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
· Pulmonary stenosis.
Note. The fourth heart sound does not denote heart failure, unlike the S3 gallop.
Potain credited Jean Baptiste Bouillaud (1786-1881), Professor of Medicine in Paris, as being the first
person to describe gallop rhythm (Jean Baptiste Bouillaud. Proc R Sec Med 1931; 24: 1253-1931).
Pierre Carl Edouard Potain (1825 1901), Parisian physician, was the first to distinguish between various
types of gallop in a short account titled Theorie du Bruit de Gallop in 1885.