SALIENT
FEATURES
· Pulse may be bisferious,
small volume or large volume, depending on the dominant lesion.
· Displaced apex beat
(remember, a small left ventricle is inconsistent with chronic severe AR).
· Early diastolic murmur
of aortic regurgitation.
· Ejection systolic murmur
of aortic stenosis.
Proceed
as follows:
Tell the examiner that you
would like to check the blood pressure, in particular to determine the pulse
pressure (systolic minus
diastolic pressure).
DIAGNOSIS
This patient has mixed
aortic stenosis with aortic regurgitation (lesion) due to rheumatic heart
disease
(aetiology). He has a
dominant stenosis and is in cardiac failure (functional status).
Note
In dominant
aortic stenosis:
· Pulse volume is small.
. Blood pressure is normal
and pulse pressure is narrow.
In dominant
aortic regurgitation:
· Pulse is collapsing.
· Pulse pressure is wide.
QUESTIONS
What are
common causes of mixed aortic lesions?
· Rheumatic heart disease.
· Bicuspid aortic valve.
What is the
pathophysiology of mixed aortic valve disease?
· In mixed aortic valve
disease, one lesion usually predominates over the other and the
pathophysiology resembles
that of the pure dominant lesion. When aortic stenosis predominates, the
pathophysiology and,
therefore, the management resembles that of pure aortic stenosis (J Am
Coil
Cardiol 1998; 32:
1486-588). TheLV in these patients develops concentric hypertrophy rather than
dilatation. The timing of
aortic valve replacement (as in pure aortic stenosis) depends on symptoms
(Circulation 1998; 98:
1949-84).
· When AR is more than
mild and the AS is predominant, the concentrically hypertrophied and
non-compliant left
ventricle is on the steeper portion of the diastolic pressure-volume curve,
resulting in
pulmonary congestion.
Theretore, although neither lesion by itself is sufficiently severe to merit
surgery,
both together produce
substantial haemodynamic compromise and require surgery (Circulation
1998; 98:
1949-84).
· When the AR is severe
and the AS is mild, the high total stroke volume from extensive regurgitation
may produce a substantial
transvalvular gradient. Because the transvalvular gradient varies with the
square of the
transvalvular flow (Am Heart J 1951; 41: 1-29), a high gradient in predominant regurgitation
may be predicted primarily
on excess transvalvular flow rather than on a severely com-promised orifice
area (Circulation
1998; 98: 1949-84).
In mixed
aortic valve disease is cardiac catheterization more accurate than Doppler
echocardiography
to measure valve area?
Aortic valve area will be
measured inaccurately at the time of cardiac catheteriz-ation in mixed aortic
valve lesions if the
cardiac output is measured either by the Fick or the thermodilution method as
both
these methods usually
underestimate total valve flow. The valve area can be measured more accurately
using Doppler
echocardiography (by continuity equation) in mixed aortic stenosis and aortic
regurgitation.
However, the confusing
nature of mixed valve disease makes cardiac catheterization necessary to obtain
additional haemodynamic
information in most patients (including coronary anatomy) (Circulation
1998;
98:1949 84).
How would
you manage such a patient?
· Surgical correction of
disease that produces more than mild symptoms.
· When the AS is dominant:
operate in the presence of even mild symptoms.
· When the AR is dominant:
surgery can be delayed until symptoms develop or asymptomatic
LVdysfunction becomes apparent on
echocardiography.
No comments:
Post a Comment